NYCAS  ‘03     The New York Conference on Asian Studies

 

 

 

  

     “The Monkey Knows No Walls.”

 

Walls in Asia

 October 17-18, 2003

 

ASIAN STUDIES PROGRAM

714 Clemens Hall

UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO

Buffalo, NY 14260

 

(716) 645-3474, (716) 645-3473 (Fax)

asian-studies@buffalo.edu

   

                                                              

 

 

REGISTRATION

 

 Accommodations & Directions

 

NYCAS03 Schedule

 

Schedule of Panels

 

Call for Papers

 

Submit Papers

 

Conference Update

 

Teacher Workshop On China

 

Student Prize

 

 Weather

 

CONTACT US

The Program will include

   ≈ A lecture/performance of Monkey King stories from Beijing opera titled, The Monkey Knows No Walls

   ≈ A plenary address by Ayesha Jalal, Professor of History at Tufts University and leading scholar on India-Pakistan partition, on Holes in the Wall: India's Partition Revisited

   ≈ An address by AAS President James L. Watson on The Other Side of the River: Hong Kong’s Border Saga, 1898-2003

   ≈ A roundtable on Asian studies in SUNY, with John Ryder, SUNY Director of the Office of International Programs

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     A wall demarcates a separation, a conceptual distinction between those it includes and excludes.  Over the centuries, walls have become symbols of Asia in the minds of Asians and non-Asians alike.  Noteworthy are the Great Wall stretching across much of North China, the Hakata wall that helped repel the Mongol Invasion from Kyushu, the 38th parallel in contemporary Korea, the newly erected wall of barbed wire along the Indo-Pakistani border. 

     Walls are structurally simple but symbolically complex.  They may denote distrust and disdain; they may also symbolize community, security, and belonging.  They may divide the known world from the unknown or make a statement about ownership or social differentiation.  They protect people from the elements and can create a sense of order in an otherwise chaotic cosmos and society.  Walls differentiate gardens from less attractive sites.  Passing through a garden’s inner wall, one moves from one visual feast to another.  Walls themselves can be aesthetic treasures.  A decaying plaster wall is integral to the visage of a rock garden.  Movable screens - themselves potential works of art - give an illusion of privacy alike in a palace room and a modern communal office.  Like the enclosure surrounding Edo’s Yoshiwara, walls can titillate, can stir curiosity and lust for what lies near but unseen and out of reach.  Walls usually have gates - routes of access and egress from one domain to another, portals of exchange and influence that can undermine the very raison d’etre of the wall itself.

     A wall often has political significance.  It may protect a fragile culture from destruction by relentless external forces, but it may also preserve power and privilege over those it encloses.  It may foster indigenous forms of expression, creativity, and worship; but it may also censor ideas and movements deemed injurious to local orthodoxy.  It may protect a society from waves of armies and colonizers; but it may also take the form of racial exclusion, gender discrimination, and trade barriers.

     The complexity of walls and their ubiquitous presence in the life of Asia - both physical and abstract - invite scholarly inquiry in a wide variety of disciplines and subject matter.  The conference will address the “Walls” theme broadly and inclusively, and envisions a program with diversity in approach and perspective.

     Walls also arise in Asian studies.  Disciplinary boundaries have both defined our field and created tensions within it.  How are these boundaries shifting?  Divisions and rifts can play a positive role in the emergence of new thought.  In our present work, which demarcations do we find to be most creative and productive?   How do the texts we read address questions of distance and intimacy?  How does our identity as Asianists wall us alternately in and out with respect to colleagues, schools of thought, and the very objects of our study?  What commonalities can enable us to confront questions of origin and indebtedness - to mothers, for instance, or to the environment - independent of cultural difference, independent of national proclivities, independent of Asia?

 

 

 

© Asian Studies Program
State University of New York at Buffalo

Maintained by Zhen Li

Hits since Jan. 24, 2003